Mid Week Comments

Crops Improve, But From Where? - 07/17/19

Markets have been erratic since the June 28 acreage report, which ignored the
obvious prevent planting that occurred in all states except the Dakota's. But
the direction ultimately has been down as temps warmed and soggy soils dried out
in the corn belt.

This is quite the interesting situation. We have an improving crop in the field
from the horrible start we had, with drying out in central corn belt soils
allowing crops to grow more 'normally' than we started the year. However, the
ratings are suggesting corn yield potential is 170 bu/acre, only 4 bu below
trend. If you look at US crops, though, they don't look even close to average.
Some looks great on the lighter soils, but heavy soils look quite bad yet (but
improving). We also have acreage planted numbers that are way too high, with
USDA set to correct those numbers once in August, and probably again when they
get the FSA numbers (which are not a survey but nearly a population count). And
the big variable left this year - frost date. Corn had 6% of the crop left to
EMERGE July 2, and soybeans 17% left to EMERGE as well. So some will freeze,
but the question is how much damage will occur??? A frost date 2 weeks early
vs. 2 weeks late is a lot of production difference. For now, the markets are
going down due to improving growing conditions. But improved won't matter much
if its not mature by the first frost date.

Weather forecasts are more consistent now, with mostly below normal precip and
above normal temps the next 2 weeks, with some exceptions. The exceptions are
that the far northern corn belt will see above normal precip along with the
southeast US/Delta most of the 14 days along with below normal temps in the

Crop progress out Monday, July 15 showed corn and soybeans had a 1% increase in
the G/E rating, corn now at 58% rated G/E and soybeans 54% G/E. The increase
resulted in a continued improvement in yield potential, with corn up 2.5 bu/acre
to 170.26 bu, with soybeans up 0.51 bu/acre to 47.7 bu/acre. Its surprising
that as late as the crop was planted, that we are getting that close to the
'trend' yield in both corn and soybeans. Progress is way behind normal, though,
with silking at only 17% corn (25% behind normal), and soybeans 22% blooming
(27% behind normal). So we need a lot of heat and a late frost to get this crop
to maturity. There still is 5% of the soybeans that haven't even EMERGED yet!!!

Cotton conditions improved 2% to 56% G/E, with sorghum conditions improving 1%
to a huge 74% rated G/E - well above last year's 47% rating. So some areas have
benefitted from the cold/wet spring (typically dry areas). Winter wheat is 57%
harvested, 14% behind normal but the weather has been fantastic for winter wheat
harvest (little rain and lots of heat). HRS wheat ratings dropped 2% to 76%
rated G/E, while barley was up 3% to 76% rated G/E. Oats also rose 3% to 68%
rated G/E, so the crops in the US for the most part continue to improve from the
horrible start. But warmer weather accompanied by drier conditions in most of
the corn belt the past few weeks have helped to dry out soils and improve
conditions. We note that topsoil moisture is finally drying out, with soils
rated adequate/surplus dropping 6% this week to 79% rated G/E. Subsoil also
dropped 3% to 84% rated adequate/surplus, so the soil moisture levels are
falling back into the levels considered ideal for crops (it was too wet). So
with crop prospects improving, it is putting pressure on the market.

The USDA July report kicked the can down the road further, with USDA choosing to
ignore the obvious prevent plant acres in ILL, IND, OH, and MO and instead just
report the same 'intentions" numbers that came out June 28 in corn and soybeans.
So they just assumed that all the corn still unplanted for that survey around
June 9 (17%) and soybeans (about half) got planted, and reported as much along
with a line that said essentially 'lots of corn and soys weren't really planted,
but we'll survey that in the next month and report on it in August'. Therefore,
all the numbers are suspect as they simply were estimates as if every acre
intended got planted (a fantasy of course). So corn carryout was increased 335
mb to 2.01 billion bu, soybean cut 250 mb to 795 mb, and wheat cut 102 mb to 1
Billion bu.

Its interesting to see soybean carryout cut 25% or 250 mb and hardly move the
market. This is especially interesting when you consider USDA, even after
cutting yield 1 bu/acre to 48.5 bu, is still 1.2 bu/acre too high (or about 100
mb). Also, the prevent planting in soybeans is probably 3-7 million acres, so
even at 5 million would be another 250 mb reduction in production. So cut
carryout another 350 mb and now things get more interesting!!! Now lets go to
harvest and first frost, where 17% of the soybeans weren't even emerged by July
2; there is a high likelihood of very low production (or zero) depending on
frost date. Corn isn't much different. Mid-June private surveys showed corn
prevent plant acres in ILL, IND, and OH at 2.7 million acres, and MO and many
other states had significant PP that wasn't reported in the June 28 survey, too.
If you subtract another 5 million acres of PP from corn you cut production
another 800 mb. What about the 6% acreage planted that hadn't even emerged by
July 2? Yield by harvest is highly dependent on frost date - i.e. will it be
50% of normal, or a zero??? It that essentially is a loss of another 3 million
acres, we just lopped off another 180 mb, and now carryout is cut in half!!! So
there's a lot of important fundamentals not reflected in this July report. In
other words, the can is kicked down the road, and the market is left to deal
with it.

Ray can be reached at raygrabanski@progressiveag.com.
Ray is President of Progressive Ag Marketing, Inc., a top Ranked marketing firm
in the country. See http://www.progressiveag.com for rankings and link to data
from Top Producer Magazine and Agweb.com.

This material has been prepared by a sales or trading employee or
agent of Progressive Ag Marketing, Inc. and is, or is in the nature
of, a solicitation. This material is not a research report prepared by
Progressive Ag Marketing's Research Department. By accepting
this communication, you agree that you are an experienced user of the
futures markets, capable of making independent trading decisions, and
agree that you are not, and will not, rely solely on this
communication in making trading decisions.


The risk of loss in trading futures and/or options is substantial and
each investor and/or trader must consider whether this is a suitable
investment. Past performance, whether actual or indicated by
simulated historical tests of strategies, is not indicative of future
results. Trading advice is based on information taken from trades and
statistical services and other sources that Progressive Ag Marketing
believes are reliable. We do not guarantee that such information is
accurate or complete and it should not be relied upon as such. Trading
advice reflects our good faith judgment at a specific time and is
subject to change without notice. There is no guarantee that advice we
give will result in profitable trades.